El Economista y el Ingeniero - ¿Shitcoins = Ponzis?
🎙️ Escuchar en X Space
🎧 Escuchar en Spotify
Automatic transcript · corrections or removal: DM @BandaWeb3
About this episode
@GarzaGarciaJG argued that Pepe and other memecoins are a Ponzi scheme because they create no real wealth. Other participants pushed back: Pepe makes no return promises, has no central entity to hold accountable, and its community gives it a cultural value beyond speculation. The debate ended without agreement, though everyone agreed on doing research before investing and watching out for scams and fake airdrops.
Chapters
- 00:00:00 Welcome and space rules
- 00:39:17 Jesús Garza: what is a Ponzi
- 00:48:19 Andrew responds: not the same
- 01:16:23 Tavo defends Pepe
- 01:37:52 Chaps confronts Jesús on Pepe
- 02:13:45 Intent and ethics of a Ponzi
- 02:38:20 Why the law doesn't see Pepe as Ponzi
- 03:00:23 Closing and safety warnings
Spoke
@GarzaGarciaJG, @con3joblanco, @mikitalpz, @epodotcom, @NFTDEFILAND, @andreweb3_btc, @Santa_Patrona_, @usainbluntmx, @eltronadito, @germangleza, @Calles_VG, @deLarg0, @0xSEJU, @ElianXBT, @JosecriptoEth, @chapsrlz, @AleRaMo30, @LinknRed
Unidentified voices: 1
Also on stage: @CryptoNotaz, @0xNxsh, @abrahamrivv